Drainage Solution Comparison
Engineering-grade comparison of drainage system performance, maintenance, and total lifecycle cost
Complete Flow Rate Comparison by Product Size & Soil Condition
All flow rates from TRI Environmental Report MAPP-LSH 2020-003. Flow rates calculated at 1 PSI.
| Product | Diameter | Surface Area | Silty Sand (~0 PSI) | Fine Sand (~0 PSI) | No Soil (1 PSI) | No Soil (2.5 PSI) | Cartridge Interval |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-Inch Products | |||||||
| JF3SS | 3″ | 17.44 in² | 0.026 GPM | 0.75 GPM | 33 GPM | 52.2 GPM | 3-5 Years |
| JF3SSCVLV | 3″ | 17.44 in² | Not tested | Not tested | 26.6 GPM | 42.1 GPM | 3-5 Years |
| GEO3SS† | 3″ | 17.44 in² | 0.017 GPM† | 0.46 GPM† | 34.7 GPM† | 54.85 GPM† | 1-3 Years‡ |
| GEO3SSCVLV† | 3″ | 17.44 in² | 0.015 GPM† | 0.43 GPM† | 30.5 GPM† | 48.28 GPM† | 1-3 Years‡ |
| Traditional 3″ | 3″ | 7.07 in² | 0.012 GPM | 0.355 GPM | 24.4 GPM | 38.6 GPM | N/A |
| 4-Inch Products | |||||||
| JF4SS | 4″ | 26.03 in² | 0.035 GPM | 1.0 GPM | 77.1 GPM | 121.9 GPM | 4-7 Years |
| JF4SSCVLV | 4″ | 26.03 in² | Not tested | Not tested | 66.5 GPM | 105.1 GPM | 4-7 Years |
| GEO4SS† | 4″ | 26.03 in² | 0.032 GPM† | 0.93 GPM† | 71.3 GPM† | 112.76 GPM† | 1-3 Years‡ |
| GEO4SSCVLV† | 4″ | 26.03 in² | 0.030 GPM† | 0.85 GPM† | 65.6 GPM† | 103.74 GPM† | 1-3 Years‡ |
| Traditional 4″ | 4″ | 12.57 in² | 0.016 GPM | 0.462 GPM | 40.2 GPM | 63.5 GPM | N/A |
| 6-Inch Products | |||||||
| JF6SS | 6″ | 76.95 in² | 0.053 GPM | 1.47 GPM | 166.6 GPM | 263.4 GPM | 6-10 Years |
| JF6SSCVLV | 6″ | 76.95 in² | Not tested | Not tested | 162.3 GPM | 256.5 GPM | 6-10 Years |
| GEO6SS† | 6″ | 76.95 in² | 0.047 GPM† | 1.36 GPM† | 154.1 GPM† | 243.64 GPM† | 1-3 Years‡ |
| GEO6SSCVLV† | 6″ | 76.95 in² | 0.043 GPM† | 1.25 GPM† | 150.1 GPM† | 237.26 GPM† | 1-3 Years‡ |
| Traditional 6″ | 6″ | 28.27 in² | 0.024 GPM | 0.67 GPM | 88.9 GPM | 140.5 GPM | N/A |
| 2.5-Inch Products | |||||||
| JF2.5ABS | 2.5″ | 2.9 in² | 0.01 GPM | 0.32 GPM | Not tested | Not tested | Annually |
| Traditional 2.5″ | 2.5″ | 4.91 in² | 0.011 GPM | 0.3 GPM | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Performance Improvement vs. Traditional 2D Weep Holes (@ 1 PSI)
(166.6 vs 88.9 GPM)
(77.1 vs 40.2 GPM)
(33 vs 24.4 GPM)
(154.1 vs 88.9 GPM)†
• Green cells = JET Filter values calculated at 1 PSI baseline from TRI Environmental Report MAPP-LSH 2020-003 (tested at 2.5 PSI)
• Yellow cells = GEOJET estimated values extrapolated from JET Filter test data (not directly tested)
• Red rows = Traditional 2D weep hole baseline values
• † GEOJET values are estimates based on similar construction to JET Filter (90-95% performance factor applied)
• ‡ GEOJET media replacement interval varies based on hydrocarbon loading conditions
• Silty Sand / Fine Sand: Flow rates measured at near 0 PSI pressure differential
• No Soil Resistance: Laboratory conditions with clean water, no soil backfill resistance
• Housing Service Life: 100 years for all 316L stainless steel housings
• Testing Standards: ASTM A240/A666, ASTM D4491, ASTM D4751, GRI-GS36, GRI-GC18
How JET Filter™ Works
Quick Selection Guide
Choose the right drainage solution for your application
JET Filter™ System
For Standard Drainage Applications
- Bridge abutments & wing walls
- Retaining walls & seawalls
- Parking structures
- Tunnels & underpasses
- Foundation drainage
Geotextile Filtration Detail:
GEOJET® System
For Environmental Protection
- Parking garages & decks
- Industrial facilities
- Fuel stations & airports
- Equipment washing areas
- EPA/NPDES compliance sites
Aquatextile Technology Detail:
Superior Filtration Through Increased Surface Area
Each size upgrade provides exponentially more filtration capacity
Engineering Note: Increased surface area directly correlates to longer maintenance intervals and higher flow capacity throughout the service life. Choose the largest size that fits your application for optimal performance.
The Clear Choice for Modern Infrastructure
Traditional 2D Weep Holes
Best for: Temporary solutions or when regulations require traditional methods
- Lowest initial cost
- Standard practice
- No filtration capability
- Highest maintenance burden
- Frequent failures
Verdict: Outdated technology with high lifecycle costs
JET Filter™ System
Best for: Most drainage applications requiring reliability and low maintenance
- 30-second installation
- Self-cleaning design
- 75+ year service life
- 90% maintenance reduction
- 15+ DOT approvals
Verdict: Industry-leading solution with proven ROI
GEOJET® System
Best for: Applications requiring hydrocarbon filtration and environmental compliance
- 99.9% hydrocarbon removal
- EPA compliance
- Aquatextile technology
- Replaceable filter inserts
- Environmental protection
Verdict: Essential for petroleum-sensitive areas
Calculate Your Savings
See how much you can save by switching to JET Filter drainage systems
10-Year Total Cost of Ownership Comparison
Traditional 2D Weep Holes
Materials: $1,000
Installation Labor: $30,000
10-Year Maintenance: $90,000
10-Year TCO: $121,000
JET Filter™ System
Product Cost: $4,000-$6,000
Installation Labor: $250
10-Year Maintenance: $500
Cartridge Replacement: $1,000
10-Year TCO: $5,750-$7,750
Your Estimated Savings
$113,250 – $115,250
~94% Cost Reduction
Calculation Methodology & Assumptions
This calculator provides estimates for planning purposes only. Actual costs vary based on project-specific factors including site access, local labor rates, equipment requirements, and regional pricing.
Traditional 2D Weep Hole Assumptions
- Installation time: 4-6 hours per opening (includes forming, pipe placement, aggregate, and finishing)
- Maintenance time: 2-4 hours per opening per visit (clearing, flushing, inspection)
- Material cost: ~$50 per opening (pipe, aggregate, geotextile)
- No filtration: Subject to frequent clogging from sediment and debris
JET Filter™ Assumptions
- Installation time: 30 seconds per unit (press-fit into existing opening)
- Maintenance time: 5 minutes per unit (visual inspection, cartridge check)
- Maintenance interval: 3-5 years (3″), 4-7 years (4″), 6-10 years (6″) based on soil conditions
- Cartridge replacement: Estimated 1 replacement per unit over 10-year period
- Product pricing: Ranges shown reflect typical market pricing; contact us for project-specific quotes
Data Sources
Flow rates and performance data from TRI Environmental Report MAPP-LSH 2020-003. Maintenance intervals based on field performance across 15+ state DOT installations. Installation times based on contractor feedback and case study documentation.
*Soil condition affects maintenance frequency. Silty sand environments require more frequent inspection due to higher sediment loading. Clean water applications may exceed stated maintenance intervals. Results do not include traffic control, lane closure costs, or emergency repair scenarios which may significantly increase traditional 2D weep hole lifecycle costs.